<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Little Bit Luddite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>thoughts on technology past/present/future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Amnesia by Results for week beginning 2013-02-18 &#124; Iron Blogger</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/digital-amnesia/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Results for week beginning 2013-02-18 &#124; Iron Blogger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=156#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Digital Amnesia [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Amnesia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hackademia hits the road by Results for week beginning 2013-02-18 &#124; Iron Blogger</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/hackademia-hits-the-road/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Results for week beginning 2013-02-18 &#124; Iron Blogger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hackademia hits the road [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hackademia hits the road [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #pdftribute by modyvishal</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/pdftribute/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[modyvishal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cheer for you and the countless others that are continuing Aaron&#039;s cause.  I am sure Aaron is looking down and smiling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cheer for you and the countless others that are continuing Aaron&#8217;s cause.  I am sure Aaron is looking down and smiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hackademia by Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/hackademia/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved your talk at Ignite Seattle last night. Thank you!
-Kirsten]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your talk at Ignite Seattle last night. Thank you!<br />
-Kirsten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recreating Email by Alek Tarkowski</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/recreating-email/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alek Tarkowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 13:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, the idea is very interesting as a thought experiment. In practice one serious difficulty concerns time zones - how would emailing between Warsaw and San Francisco work, if my work hours are at night (PST) and vice-versa? The systems could of course respect first one time zone and then the next, but it would further stretch waiting times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, the idea is very interesting as a thought experiment. In practice one serious difficulty concerns time zones &#8211; how would emailing between Warsaw and San Francisco work, if my work hours are at night (PST) and vice-versa? The systems could of course respect first one time zone and then the next, but it would further stretch waiting times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recreating Email by &#187; Thoughts on Revamping Email in the Office Coffee Theory</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/recreating-email/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Thoughts on Revamping Email in the Office Coffee Theory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Does Email Tell Us About Our Values? According to Professor Beth Kollo in her blog post &#8220;Recreating Email&#8220;, Email values the always available. It values immediacy of online-ness. It values bulk [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Email Tell Us About Our Values? According to Professor Beth Kollo in her blog post &#8220;Recreating Email&#8220;, Email values the always available. It values immediacy of online-ness. It values bulk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recreating Email by Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/recreating-email/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abhishek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 10:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If people start walking to each other&#039;s office how about a person who is trying to focus on work. I guess this will bring back active communication back which is good and bad. Good probably because it will be faster resolve conflict etc but then a person won&#039;t have time for herself to accomplish things.

I don&#039;t think email is broken especially after inventions like priority inbox from gmail. 

You can chose to ignore, delete, spam and not to reply emails. It is the best form of passive communication. You are not expected to reply right away.

I would not like people coming to my place and asking me things now and then. I would certainly like them to email their issues which can certainly wait for some more time till I get a chance to reply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people start walking to each other&#8217;s office how about a person who is trying to focus on work. I guess this will bring back active communication back which is good and bad. Good probably because it will be faster resolve conflict etc but then a person won&#8217;t have time for herself to accomplish things.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think email is broken especially after inventions like priority inbox from gmail. </p>
<p>You can chose to ignore, delete, spam and not to reply emails. It is the best form of passive communication. You are not expected to reply right away.</p>
<p>I would not like people coming to my place and asking me things now and then. I would certainly like them to email their issues which can certainly wait for some more time till I get a chance to reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recreating Email by Greg Linster</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/recreating-email/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Linster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 04:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post!  I think it&#039;s a wonderful idea to limit email delivery times.  I&#039;ll add the following: what if email was only delivered twice a day on work email accounts?  This could potentially give people longer periods of uninterrupted creative time in the office which is key to doing &quot;real&quot; work.  If there was a pressing matter colleagues could always use the phone or walk over to someones desk.  Paradoxically, I think people might actually get more work done with less email pressure in this scenario too.  

I&#039;m curious, what do you think smartphones tell us about our values?  I find that cell phones create many of the same problems you describe about email.  It&#039;s harder and harder to take a &quot;real&quot; vacation anymore thanks to smartphones and emails.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I think it&#8217;s a wonderful idea to limit email delivery times.  I&#8217;ll add the following: what if email was only delivered twice a day on work email accounts?  This could potentially give people longer periods of uninterrupted creative time in the office which is key to doing &#8220;real&#8221; work.  If there was a pressing matter colleagues could always use the phone or walk over to someones desk.  Paradoxically, I think people might actually get more work done with less email pressure in this scenario too.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, what do you think smartphones tell us about our values?  I find that cell phones create many of the same problems you describe about email.  It&#8217;s harder and harder to take a &#8220;real&#8221; vacation anymore thanks to smartphones and emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recreating Email by R</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/recreating-email/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was part of a small workgroup once where, as an experiment, email clients were set to check only on at the top and bottom of the hour, on the theory that this would decrease interruptions and chatter around issues that were best solved directly by voice contact. It worked, but people got annoyed when they found out since *they* would never waste time, special boys and princesses all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was part of a small workgroup once where, as an experiment, email clients were set to check only on at the top and bottom of the hour, on the theory that this would decrease interruptions and chatter around issues that were best solved directly by voice contact. It worked, but people got annoyed when they found out since *they* would never waste time, special boys and princesses all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recreating Email by Alex Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/recreating-email/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Finkelstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethkolko.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Beth, I completely agree that the Email need to be &quot;fixed&quot; as it creates overload. What would you say that instead of rules that restrict the Send/Receive to working hours, the idea of the &quot;desktop&quot; will be transferred into the inbox - meaning that the email is still arriving in whatever time it is sent but it is accumulated on the &quot;desktop&quot; - which in turn has the regular working hours. So, as far as the sender is concerned, the Email was sent and has reached my &quot;desk&quot; but if I am not in the office, I can&#039;t see it, right? (such as a paper memo that was placed in my in-tray, while I am away).
From the view point of the recipient (me) I have the same working privileges as I have in my current inbox (send receive, remote access, etc.), but I need to flag clearly if I have seen the particular item on my &quot;desk&quot; or not.
The way i see it, this will have the advantages of your idea about setting the boundaries, while not applying to many restrictions on the users and the corporate system.
However...the immediate issue is the question - what is considered as the office? If we are talking global corporations then there is the GMT issue to consider and also there is an issue of the &quot;remote desktops&quot; of various kind (working from home, seminar, etc).
Thank you for a great and thought provoking post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Beth, I completely agree that the Email need to be &#8220;fixed&#8221; as it creates overload. What would you say that instead of rules that restrict the Send/Receive to working hours, the idea of the &#8220;desktop&#8221; will be transferred into the inbox &#8211; meaning that the email is still arriving in whatever time it is sent but it is accumulated on the &#8220;desktop&#8221; &#8211; which in turn has the regular working hours. So, as far as the sender is concerned, the Email was sent and has reached my &#8220;desk&#8221; but if I am not in the office, I can&#8217;t see it, right? (such as a paper memo that was placed in my in-tray, while I am away).<br />
From the view point of the recipient (me) I have the same working privileges as I have in my current inbox (send receive, remote access, etc.), but I need to flag clearly if I have seen the particular item on my &#8220;desk&#8221; or not.<br />
The way i see it, this will have the advantages of your idea about setting the boundaries, while not applying to many restrictions on the users and the corporate system.<br />
However&#8230;the immediate issue is the question &#8211; what is considered as the office? If we are talking global corporations then there is the GMT issue to consider and also there is an issue of the &#8220;remote desktops&#8221; of various kind (working from home, seminar, etc).<br />
Thank you for a great and thought provoking post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
